Film Rats Club

Feature

Feature

Man, Technology and the Psychological in-betweens: a review of Olanrewaju Samuel’s The Wall

The similarities Chocolate and Social Media share end at the aftereffect stage of an over-consumption or an addiction. While a bloated stomach or pile can easily be treated with pills off the counter and herbal fluids corked in bottles, depression, a defeated sense of self-worth and other pitfalls of excessive social media usage require a more systematic approach to healing. The tale of the effects of social media on the human mind is not a new one. While most filmmakers are wont to document the doomed tale of social media addiction with a focus on ripple effects: human existence and participation in group graduations from family to the society at large, Accelerate filmmaker 2018 participant Samuel Olanrewaju, has chosen to inspect the relationship on a more intricate level. Aptly titled ‘The Wall’ , the film plays out majorly on a ‘wall-like’ interface transmitting the dealings and interactions taking place on the ‘wall’ of her profile. The story is simple. A young lady’s interaction with a social media platform that appears to be a bleached version of Facebook evolves from curiosity and patience as she approaches the social media interface, provides necessary details and waits for a profile to be formed; to skepticism as she familiarizes herself with the interface; to joy as she’s starting to get a hang of the whole thing and is finding very enjoyable the attention represented by the emojis and the entire pizzazz ; to smugness as she’s mastered the lingo of the platform and is garnering even more reactions from a fan base. It is at this stage the addiction is noted. It is also at this stage the diminishing effect swoops in. The entire room is suddenly coloured in haunting red and a repetitive buzzing sound adds to the unsettling mix. The opening scene of the film with the young lady curled in the fetal position of despair in the buzzing red room of doom makes sense at this point: the end stage of the  the lady’s unguarded social media interaction is fatigue. Isn’t this the story for most of us? The positivity of early social media usage slowly replaced by fatigue and pessimism as our addiction allows the media to lord our thoughts and actions and the constant need to keep up and fit in catches up to us. The associative need to conform that this stage ensures is also captured by this film: the sudden make over from bland clothing to a fancier purple gown and an overall glossier appearance, and the doffing of the wig at the concluding scene of the film. Plaudits must go to the director, cinematographer and rest of the team for enriching what could have been a bland narration of man-machine interaction with appendage behavioral representations that renders the film somewhat relatable. The Wall is a complete story. It’s easy to doubt that, but it is. And like most stories we enjoy, it provides a chance at redemption for the hero. The decisiveness of the tired young lady in deleting the social media account is not cowardice, not extremism, not an unwise disregard for the many benefits of social media— common clapbacks to decisions to take breaks. It is simply an acknowledgement that, perhaps, social media platform isn’t just for her yet, that maybe when she feels she’s ready and resolute enough to counter any possible leaning towards an unhealthy addiction, she might give it another chance. But the resoluteness, the single-mindedness of the decision is what appeals greatly. The “I am taking charge of this” vibe is one we could all do with it in this crazed world.

Feature

The Gods are not Chauvnists; a Reading of “Tolu” by ‘Chukwu Martin

CAN NADINE CHANGE THE WORLD? It is quite obvious that Nadine Ibrahim is attracted to stories heavy on child- friendly, nuclear,societal and cultural influences. Her film ”Through Her Eyes” (2018), tells the story of Azeeza, a young girl abducted by a terrorist group and forced to witness and carry out their plans and of course “Tolu” (2017) which translates as TOLU (Ti’Oluwa) meaning “god’s own” a story about a girl who proves to be more than she appears to be. Shot in a time when talk about women empowerment and various shades of feminism have frequently become the meal at the table, Nalia Media in 2017 presented TOLU, directed by then 23 year old Nadine Ibrahim. In an interview with Enuma Okoro for Guardian, March 2017, she said “ I want to tell stories that can change the world”. She appears to have rated true to her mandate with films like “Tolu”. How well can the story of Tolu change the world as Nadine desires? When we move past the obvious ham acting, continuity errors in CGI manipulations, very poor subtitling and somewhat displaced modules/variations in language articulation, we find levels of depth to Nadine Ibrahim’s TOLU, a supposed adventure film. But why Tolu? Why that name? (her parents obviously didn’t sound Yoruba) Was she adopted, found by the sea maybe? This would be plausible as it provides context in her desire to duck the societal norm and try out fishing, a male dominated profession. Has she been chosen by the gods? (Laughable but culturally believable) Is she simply a vehicle, a metaphor, for the travails and eventual successes of women empowerment? Is she an audiovisual griot of some sort for the feministic agenda? Many questions arise from this 12minutes film. The story is simple. A brief adventure of a girl Tolu (Halimat Olanrewaju) who goes out to fish all by herself with hope to return with a basket full of fish to impress her nagging father (Karibi Fubara) and her mother (Somkele Iyamah-Idhalama).At sea, she meets an ‘old man’ who helps her. It is that simple. The surface theme in this film as we learn from the OLD MAN played by Wale Ojo is that “whatever a male can do, a female child can do too and even better” (6:48) (pardon that poor sentence construction. Editors and subtitles huh? Sounded much better in Yoruba language when said by the Old man).The line above is suggestive of an attempt to propagate a social feminist ideologue. “Usually when you see females in movies, they feel like they have these metallic structures around them, they are caged by male energy.”  ― Björk Feminism/ˈfɛmɪnɪz(ə)m/ (the advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.) This is easily noticed in her recent offering. Olokun makes an appearance in this film as might be unintended by the filmmakers but his appearance as the Old man makes the intention of the adventure at sea valuable to the essence of this film. Olokun in West Africa is believed to be the Orisha of great wealth and of the bottom of the ocean. Olokun is revered as the ruler of all water bodies and authority overother water deities. Communities in West Africa and the African Diaspora view Olokun as female or male (this gives light that the gods are not gender bias). In this case, Olokun chooses to come as a man, so to speak, the gods are not chauvnists. Maybe if Olokun had appeared in form of a woman to Tolu, the story would have further laid credence to its feministic intentions. In his appearance in the film, the Old man gifts Tolu with his wisdom, tells her about patience and how she must approach life. The most important thing he does is to teach her how to use a net to fish. She needed a father to teach her and she got one. The Old man also gifts her with a pendant and suggests that he’s always there to guide her. The relationship here is very warm and abolishes gender wars as seen in today’s modern society. However, this film happens to fall flat without an after-cinema agenda/effect, as I believe films like this are supposed to make a grounded statement through its style and form, making an impact on its specific audience after seeing the film, for me it did not. But perhaps this article helps make the neccesary understanding of Nadine’ s supposed subtext. Tolu’s story would have led a major campaign in recent times in the path of societal gender revolution, end gender wars or in its stead “Power to Womanhood”, through the hands of a girl who is gifted unknown powers, powers that might change the whole concept of womanhood and its inferiority.  Anyway, this is to my own accord. The film “Tolu” is an enthusiastic, adventurous project that deserves a remake with a patent vision and a more mature statement with the elements as suggested in this reading.      

Feature

FILM AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN NNAJI’S “LIONHEART” by Dika Ofoma

Film like any other art form has functions other than entertainment. Over the years, film has become a powerful vehicle for culture, education, leisure, propaganda and has served therapeutic purposes. Film plays important roles in the development of any groups of people, ethnicity, and race as a nation or country. It is a veritable tool of national development. One of the key areas in which it performs this duty is in the realm of culture. Culture is the totality of the ways of life of a group of people or nation including their food, costumes, dressing, music, marriage and burial practices etc, and it is the bedrock of the essence of being of a people. Film is a purveyor of culture. And this is what the film “Lionheart” does. By portraying the Nigerian culture vividly in the film, Lionheart makes bold statements about the Nigerian people.   Lionheart captures the challenges and travails of a female in a male-dominated industry. It tells the story of Adaeze who steps into her father’s shoes when health issues force him to take a step back from his company. The use of the Nigerian Languages, Igbo and Hausa in the film serves as a reminder that these languages should be preserved as it is through a language you can get to know and get involved with the culture. We also see a deliberateness in the costuming in Lionheart, we see characters wearing Nigerian attires and the women wearing Nigerian Hairstyles as opposed to straight hair weavons and wigs. Our clothing indicates who we are as individuals in any society. The beautiful shots of Enugu brings her alive, presenting to the world the beauty and aesthetics of the Coal City and Nigeria at large.   Lionheart does more than depict the Nigerian culture in its contribution to national development. Before the opening credits roll, Nnaji’s character is introduced trying to manage a group of touts protesting at the premises of Lionheart (the eponymous transport company) for some money they’re entitled to for simply being touts. If we forgive the awkwardness of that scene (who plays diplomacy with a group of touts in pristine English?), we’d see that the intentions of that scene goes far beyond introducing Adaeze as efficient and competent. Many may have missed this, but there’s a clip at the end of the film, after the end credits have rolled (credit cookie) where we see some of the touts from the opening scene manning Lionheart’s gate as gatemen and security guards. The film’s message is, that for vices such as thuggery to be curbed, there’s a dire need for the youths of Nigeria to be empowered and employed. However Lionheart’s biggest contribution to national development comes with exploring ethnicism as a theme in the film. Ethnicism is arguably the bedrock of many of Nigeria’s problems and woes and I admire the thoughtfulness in making it one of the film’s subthemes. When Adaeze and Uncle Godswill propose a merger between Lionheart and Maikano in a bid to save the Lionheart company from bankruptcy to Chief Ernest, he expresses his reservations “Ndi Hausa?”. As simple as this expression is, it exposed his doubts in having business dealings with a Hausa man for the simple reason of him being from another ethnic group. The paradox is found in the scene where Ernest and Maikano meet and he reveals in fluent Hausa that he was actually born and raised in the north. This is where they find confluence and thus, their prejudice and distrusts are tossed out of the window.   The portrayal of Igbo and Hausa culture in the contemporary Nigerian setting does not only  preach unity in diversity, it also redefined stereotypes of the Igbo as money-loving and Hausa-hating. What this movie tries to say is that there are bad eggs or rotten apples be it Igbo, Hausa or Yoruba. Lionheart draws a conclusion that only when we set our differences aside and find unity amidst our diversity can we progress and move forward not only as individuals but in a larger sense as a country     Contributor: Dika Ofoma is a graduate of History and International Studies. He is a _nollyphile_ and is interested in film discussions. He also produces a show on radio and writes short fiction sometimes.

Feature

A READING OF OSUOFIA IN LONDON by ‘Chukwu Martin

“I COME, I SAW, I CONQUER!” DISAPORA AND THE BLACK MAN-“OSUOFIA IN LONDON” A FILM PRODUCED AND DIRECTED BY ELOHO KINGSLEY OGORO “Eliminate the diaspora or the diaspora will surely eliminate you” – (Ze’ev Jabotinsky) This 2001 film in two parts written by Kola Muiz and Emeka Obiakonwa is a story set within two worlds; Europe and Africa, (Nigeria). A poor village hunter; Osuofia Esigbo Nwokorie sets out on an adventure to claim his late brother’s wealth in London. This journey takes us through Osuofia’s misadventures in the heart of London amidst its ‘alien culture’.  Using ‘Culture shock’ as framework for the film, the filmmakers cleverly through its narrative (though not technically fantastic) lead us through a comic-eye-opening world of the “bushman” in the “big city”. Jonathan Hayes states of the character Osuofia in his book Nollywood: The Creation of Nigerian Film Genres (Pg.228) “…with Osuofia leading the park as the comic rogue…He is self-centered, greedy, and scheming. He is domineering as well as irresponsible; characteristically, he is both at once…Osuofia is above all, a talker, exceptionally voluble even in this voluble tradition, words streaming forcefully out of his collected mien. He plays with language and uses it as a weapon, jabbing, probing, overwhelming, a master of the novel insult…” With these defining attributes, we see an African man try to intelligently surpass the white man’s schemes to dupe him off his inheritance through the body of the ‘black man’ – Ben Okafor (Charles Angiama), and by his side the serpentine Samantha (Mara Derwent) who both serve well as antagonists in the narrative. The character of Osuofia (Nkem Owoh) and Ben Okafor (Charles Angiama) are similar contrasts in the play of these identities. Osuofia the (the African ) and Ben Okafor (the “Whiteman”). Ben is an African in diaspora, he seems to have accepted the soul of the white man and works at erasing every part of him that reflects Africa which he considers uncivilized. However, he hasn’t changed his father’s name which possibly has some personal gain for him. These two characters are the focus of this reading. A lost soul in the sea of many African souls in Diaspora Over the years, many Africans have travelled over the seas to find greener havens in the white man’s land. Now and for the past generations, there has been a flock from across seas into diaspora (a word that sounds like the abyss). These Africans have come thus far willingly- often the sons and daughters of the most educated and affluent segments of the African Society, they have come to the white man’s land to fulfill dreams. But often, they have come because they feel dreams don’t come true in Africa due to strife, corruption and misrule. They have remained cows in this green land feeding off grass and getting milked, too dry to return home for shame, lost. Taking a hint from the restroom monologue, here Ben Okafor flaunts his accent and dislike in dealing with Africans. He categorizes them as “semi-illiterate foreign clients”                   Osuofia in London Pt1: Ben Okafor’s Restroom monologue (1:08:27) He continues: BEN OKAFOR: …and when I get annoyed, I lose my British accent…my cultivated, natural, English accent. Then I start to speak like my father! And I don’t like it! In this monologue, the word “father” is connotative, varying in layered meanings to the internal struggle he must face from being black, so he must denounce every iota of that black heritage, so as to have better opportunities and get accepted by these foreign clients. A case of an extremity in the saying “When in Rome do as the Romans do”. As the character wishes not to speak like his father, he gets a sudden whiff of home and loses himself in a blink. But not for long, have an accent and blend in. This scene is very significant to the core of this reading as it exposes the thoughts of many Africans in Diaspora who have decided to lose touch with their root so as to blend in. As many African brothers and sisters still stand at the river bank waiting for the ship – ignorant. The opening narration gives a clue; EXT. LONDON – DAY THE narrator speaks as camera opens with glam montage of a London Tower  bridge, castle, double-decker buses and skyscrapers… NARRATOR:  …But true enough, elsewhere on this planet, other people build large jungles of concrete and steel, where life was TENSE and often very SAD. *Did the filmmakers decide to use these words to enhance the opening mood of the character Samantha who is in mourning or is it an account of their own SAD experiences?* About Africa, the narrator continues: NARRATOR: Now in our small and peaceful village, big cities and fast lifestyles never entered their wildest dreams, politics and confusion remained unknown… Osuofia would also narrate the story of his younger brother Donatus, for whom their father sold all his property to finance his travel abroad, even when their father died no one heard from him. Until now, twenty years later a message is delivered through Teacher Charles, a village teacher (Paul U.U Udonsi) and a man presumably a lawyer (Stephen Ahanonu) to inform him of Donatus’ death with a will lording Osuofia as the heir to his property.  This buttresses the ill-luck of many Africans in Diaspora whose family have to suffer to send them out of the country as they never look back afterwards. Sound Sultan – a Nigerian musician proclaims this well in his hit song “Motherland”. Many of them like Donatus are pronounced dead after many years, empty coffins buried in their “honour” as they rest in peace. Osuofia, a poor farmer who could barely provide the needs of his family stands out as the chosen man, the first man to step foot in the white man’s land, as he is to inherit his late brother’s property abroad. He becomes the hero of the village (the Man of the People).

Feature

Film Rats Club trailer

Film Rats Club hosts a number of film critics, reviewers and enthusiasts. We are a focus group passionate about providing objective constructive thoughts about your films, with consideration and sound understanding of the preproduction, scripting and post production stages of filmmaking. Contact us today. @Filmratsng IG and Twitter

Scroll to Top